FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2021-22901 High

TLS session caching disaster

libcurl can be tricked into using already freed memory when a new TLS session is negotiated or a client certificate is requested on an existing connection. For example, this can happen when a TLS server requests a client certificate on a connection that was established without one. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. OpenSSL can declare a "new session" for different reasons, including the initial TLS handshake completion, TLS 1.2 (or earlier) renegotiation, or TLS 1.3 client certificate requests. When libcurl at runtime sets up support for session ID caching on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when OpenSSL considers a new session to be established. However, if the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function accesses a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.

Exploit probability 60.1%
Published May 26, 2021
Required by Not available
Last source change May 27, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Unknown Unknown

20 explicit affected versions

Unknown Unknown

6 explicit affected versions

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2021-22901

curl 7.75.0 through 7.76.1 suffers from a use-after-free vulnerability resulting in already freed memory being used when a TLS 1.3 session ticket arrives over a connection. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. When libcurl at run-time sets up support for TLS 1.3 session tickets on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when a session ticket arrives. If the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function will access a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities CURL-CVE-2021-22901

libcurl can be tricked into using already freed memory when a new TLS session is negotiated or a client certificate is requested on an existing connection. For example, this can happen when a TLS server requests a client certificate on a connection that was established without one. A malicious server can use this in rare unfortunate circumstances to potentially reach remote code execution in the client. OpenSSL can declare a "new session" for different reasons, including the initial TLS handshake completion, TLS 1.2 (or earlier) renegotiation, or TLS 1.3 client certificate requests. When libcurl at runtime sets up support for session ID caching on a connection using OpenSSL, it stores pointers to the transfer in-memory object for later retrieval when OpenSSL considers a new session to be established. However, if the connection is used by multiple transfers (like with a reused HTTP/1.1 connection or multiplexed HTTP/2 connection) that first transfer object might be freed before the new session is established on that connection and then the function accesses a memory buffer that might be freed. When using that memory, libcurl might even call a function pointer in the object, making it possible for a remote code execution if the server could somehow manage to get crafted memory content into the correct place in memory.

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence