FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2021-33621 High

CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object.

Exploit probability 2.3%
Published November 18, 2022
Required by Not available
Last source change August 13, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

RubyGems cgi

9 explicit affected versions

Unknown Unknown

24 explicit affected versions

Bitnami ruby-min
Bitnami ruby

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities BIT-ruby-min-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities BIT-ruby-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-vc47-6rqg-c7f5

Ruby gem cgi.rb prior to versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2 allow HTTP header injection. If a CGI application using the CGI library inserts untrusted input into the HTTP response header, an attacker can exploit it to insert a newline character to split a header, and inject malicious content to deceive clients. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.5, 0.2.2 and 0.1.0.2.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2021-33621

The cgi gem before 0.1.0.2, 0.2.x before 0.2.2, and 0.3.x before 0.3.5 for Ruby allows HTTP response splitting. This is relevant to applications that use untrusted user input either to generate an HTTP response or to create a CGI::Cookie object.

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence