FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2024-45296 High

path-to-regexp outputs backtracking regular expressions

### Impact A bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (`.`). For example, `/:a-:b`. ### Patches For users of 0.1, upgrade to `0.1.10`. All other users should upgrade to `8.0.0`. These versions add backtrack protection when a custom regex pattern is not provided: - [0.1.10](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v0.1.10) - [1.9.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v1.9.0) - [3.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v3.3.0) - [6.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v6.3.0) They do not protect against vulnerable user supplied capture groups. Protecting against explicit user patterns is out of scope for old versions and not considered a vulnerability. Version [7.1.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v7.1.0) can enable `strict: true` and get an error when the regular expression might be bad. Version [8.0.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v8.0.0) removes the features that can cause a ReDoS. ### Workarounds All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change `/:a-:b` to `/:a-:b([^-/]+)`. If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. For example, halving the attack string improves performance by 4x faster. ### Details Using `/:a-:b` will produce the regular expression `/^\/([^\/]+?)-([^\/]+?)\/?$/`. This can be exploited by a path such as `/a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a`. [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) has a good example of why this occurs, but the TL;DR is the `/a` at the end ensures this route would never match but due to naive backtracking it will still attempt every combination of the `:a-:b` on the repeated 8,000 `-a`. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS. In local benchmarks, exploiting the unsafe regex will result in performance that is over 1000x worse than the safe regex. In a more realistic environment using Express v4 and 10 concurrent connections, this translated to average latency of ~600ms vs 1ms. ### References * [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) * [Detailed blog post](https://blakeembrey.com/posts/2024-09-web-redos/)

Exploit probability 0.9%
Published September 9, 2024
Required by Not available
Last source change July 8, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

npm path-to-regexp
npm path-to-regexp
Unknown Unknown

56 explicit affected versions

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2

### Impact A bad regular expression is generated any time you have three or more parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (`.`). For example, `/:a-:b-:c` or `/:a-:b-:c-:d`. The backtrack protection added in `[email protected]` only prevents ambiguity for two parameters. With three or more, the generated lookahead does not block single separator characters, so capture groups overlap and cause catastrophic backtracking. ### Patches Upgrade to [[email protected]](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v.0.1.13) Custom regex patterns in route definitions (e.g., `/:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)`) are not affected because they override the default capture group. ### Workarounds All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change `/:a-:b-:c` to `/:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)`. If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. ### References - [GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j) - [Detailed blog post: ReDoS the web](https://blakeembrey.com/posts/2024-09-web-redos/)

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j

### Impact A bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (`.`). For example, `/:a-:b`. ### Patches For users of 0.1, upgrade to `0.1.10`. All other users should upgrade to `8.0.0`. These versions add backtrack protection when a custom regex pattern is not provided: - [0.1.10](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v0.1.10) - [1.9.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v1.9.0) - [3.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v3.3.0) - [6.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v6.3.0) They do not protect against vulnerable user supplied capture groups. Protecting against explicit user patterns is out of scope for old versions and not considered a vulnerability. Version [7.1.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v7.1.0) can enable `strict: true` and get an error when the regular expression might be bad. Version [8.0.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v8.0.0) removes the features that can cause a ReDoS. ### Workarounds All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change `/:a-:b` to `/:a-:b([^-/]+)`. If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. For example, halving the attack string improves performance by 4x faster. ### Details Using `/:a-:b` will produce the regular expression `/^\/([^\/]+?)-([^\/]+?)\/?$/`. This can be exploited by a path such as `/a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a`. [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) has a good example of why this occurs, but the TL;DR is the `/a` at the end ensures this route would never match but due to naive backtracking it will still attempt every combination of the `:a-:b` on the repeated 8,000 `-a`. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS. In local benchmarks, exploiting the unsafe regex will result in performance that is over 1000x worse than the safe regex. In a more realistic environment using Express v4 and 10 concurrent connections, this translated to average latency of ~600ms vs 1ms. ### References * [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) * [Detailed blog post](https://blakeembrey.com/posts/2024-09-web-redos/)

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2024-45296

path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0.

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence