FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2025-38313 Not scored

bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable. In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed. This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive. WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);

Exploit probability 0.2%
Published July 10, 2025
Required by Not available
Last source change July 15, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Linux Kernel
Unknown Unknown

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

related OPENSUSE-SU-2025:20081-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:02853-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:02923-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:02969-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:02996-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:02997-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:03011-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:03023-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:03204-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:20577-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:20586-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:20601-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:20602-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:21074-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:21139-1
related SUSE-SU-2025:21179-1

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2025-38313

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bus: fsl-mc: fix double-free on mc_dev The blamed commit tried to simplify how the deallocations are done but, in the process, introduced a double-free on the mc_dev variable. In case the MC device is a DPRC, a new mc_bus is allocated and the mc_dev variable is just a reference to one of its fields. In this circumstance, on the error path only the mc_bus should be freed. This commit introduces back the following checkpatch warning which is a false-positive. WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required + if (mc_bus) + kfree(mc_bus);

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence