Project existence disclosure in LXD images API

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2025-54291

Information disclosure in images API in Canonical LXD before 6.5 and 5.21.4 on all platforms allows unauthenticated remote attackers to determine project existence via differing HTTP status code responses.

Open Source Vulnerabilities GO-2025-4005

Canonical LXD Project Existence Determination Through Error Handling in Image Get Function in github.com/canonical/lxd

Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-xch9-h8qw-85c7

### Impact The LXD /1.0/images endpoint is implemented as an AllowUntrusted API that requires no authentication, making it accessible to users without accounts. This API allows determining project existence through differences in HTTP status codes when accessed with the project parameter. https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/images.go#L63-L69 This configuration allows access without authentication: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/daemon.go#L924-L926 This API returns a 404 error when accessing existing projects and a 403 error when accessing non-existent projects, allowing confirmation of project existence through this difference. The problematic implementation is shown below. First, in the error handling implementation of the imagesGet function below, project existence is checked within the `projectutils.ImageProject` function, and the err returned by the `ImageProject` function is directly returned to the user. https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/i mages.go#L1781-L1788 When the project doesn't exist, the error is 404 (http.StatusNotFound), which is returned to the user: https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/db/cluster/projects.mapper.go#L237-L239 On the other hand, when the project exists but the user lacks viewing permissions, the imagesGet function returns 403 (response.Forbidden): https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/images.go#L1796-L1799 ### Reproduction Steps 1. Send the following request without authentication to a non-existent project: ``` curl -k "https://lxd-host:8443/1.0/images?project=XXX-project" ``` Response: ```json {"type":"error","status":"","status_code":0,"operation":"","error_code":404,"error":"fetch project: Project not found","metadata":null} ``` 2. Send a request without authentication to an existing project (if a public project exists, it will be included in the response): ``` curl -k "https://lxd-host:8443/1.0/images?project=exist-project" ``` Reponse: ``` {"type":"error","status":"","status_code":0,"operation":"","error_code":403,"error":"Untrusted callers may only access public images in the default project","metadata":null} ``` ### Risk The attack requires only network access to the LXD API endpoint, with no authentication needed. The attack allows confirming the existence of projects within the LXD system by exploiting differences in HTTP status codes. This could potentially increase the exploitability of othervulnerabilities. Additionally, since project IDs often use meaningful names set by users, this could lead to leakage of unpublished product information. However, resource information within projects cannot be obtained, limiting the impact to existence confirmation only. ### Countermeasures It is recommended to modify the error handling in the imagesGet function to return consistent responses regardless of project existence. Specifically, when an error occurs during project existence verification, the implementation should be changed to always return a 403 (Untrusted callers may only access public images in the default project) error to unauthenticated users. This ensures that the same error response is returned for both existing and non-existing projects, preventing determination of project existence. ### Patches | LXD Series | Status | | ------------- | ------------- | | 6 | Fixed in LXD 6.5 | | 5.21 | Fixed in LXD 5.21.4 | | 5.0 | Ignored - Not critical | | 4.0 | Ignored - EOL and not critical | ### References Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.