FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2026-11525 Low

undici vulnerable to Set-Cookie SameSite attribute downgrade via permissive substring matching

## Impact When undici parses a `Set-Cookie` header, it accepts any `SameSite` attribute value that contains `Strict`, `Lax`, or `None` as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens: - `SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness` is parsed as `None`, the most permissive setting. - `SameSite=StrictLax` is parsed as `Lax`, a downgrade from `Strict`. Affected applications are those that consume `Set-Cookie` headers from server responses (for example via undici's `fetch` or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed `sameSite` attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer's view of a cookie's SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide. This was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added. ## Patches Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. ## Workarounds After parsing a `Set-Cookie` header, validate that the resulting `sameSite` attribute is one of `'Strict'`, `'Lax'`, or `'None'` (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it.

Exploit probability 0.2%
Published June 19, 2026
Required by Not available
Last source change June 20, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Unknown Unknown

246 explicit affected versions

npm undici

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-11525

Impact: When undici parses a Set-Cookie header, it accepts any SameSite attribute value that contains Strict, Lax, or None as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens. For example, SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness is parsed as None (the most permissive setting), and SameSite=StrictLax is parsed as Lax (a downgrade from Strict). Affected applications are those that consume Set-Cookie headers from server responses (for example via undici's fetch or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed sameSite attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer's view of a cookie's SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide. This was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added. Patches: Upgrade to undici v6.26.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. Workarounds: After parsing a Set-Cookie header, validate that the resulting sameSite attribute is one of 'Strict', 'Lax', or 'None' (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-g8m3-5g58-fq7m

## Impact When undici parses a `Set-Cookie` header, it accepts any `SameSite` attribute value that contains `Strict`, `Lax`, or `None` as a substring, rather than the case-insensitive exact match specified by RFC 6265. Non-spec values are silently mapped to one of the three standard tokens: - `SameSite=NoneOfYourBusiness` is parsed as `None`, the most permissive setting. - `SameSite=StrictLax` is parsed as `Lax`, a downgrade from `Strict`. Affected applications are those that consume `Set-Cookie` headers from server responses (for example via undici's `fetch` or proxy code paths) and then forward or rely on the parsed `sameSite` attribute. A malicious or non-compliant server can coerce the consumer's view of a cookie's SameSite policy to a weaker value, silently degrading the SameSite enforcement the cookie is supposed to provide. This was introduced in undici 5.15.0 when the cookies feature was added. ## Patches Upgrade to undici v6.27.0, v7.28.0 or v8.5.0. ## Workarounds After parsing a `Set-Cookie` header, validate that the resulting `sameSite` attribute is one of `'Strict'`, `'Lax'`, or `'None'` (exact, case-insensitive) before forwarding or relying on it.

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence