FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2026-27017 Low

Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls

Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls

Exploit probability 0.2%
Published February 24, 2026
Required by Not available
Last source change February 24, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Unknown Unknown

13 explicit affected versions

Go github.com/refraction-networking/utls
Go github.com/refraction-networking/utls

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

related OPENSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-27017

uTLS is a fork of crypto/tls, created to customize ClientHello for fingerprinting resistance while still using it for the handshake. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.8.0 contain a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, related to cipher suite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred cipher suite in the outer ClientHello and for ECH, it does so consistently based on hardware support—for example, if it prefers AES for the outer cipher suite, it also uses AES for ECH. However, the Chrome parrot in uTLS hardcodes AES preference for outer cipher suites but selects the ECH cipher suite randomly between AES and ChaCha20. This creates a 50% chance of selecting ChaCha20 for ECH while using AES for the outer cipher suite, a combination impossible in Chrome. This issue only affects GREASE ECH; in real ECH, Chrome selects the first valid cipher suite when AES is preferred, which uTLS handles correctly. This issue has been fixed in version 1.8.1.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-7m29-f4hw-g2vx

There is a fingerprint mismatch with Chrome when using GREASE ECH, having to do with ciphersuite selection. When Chrome selects the preferred ciphersuite in the outer ClientHello and the ciphersuite for ECH, it does so consistently based on hardware support. That means, for example, if it prefers AES for the outer ciphersuite, it would also use AES for ECH. The Chrome parrot in utls hardcodes AES preference for outer ciphersuites but selects the ECH ciphersuite randomly between AES and ChaCha20. So there is a 50% chance of selecting ChaCha20 for ECH while using AES for the outer ciphersuite, which is impossible in Chrome. This is only a problem in GREASE ECH, since in real ECH Chrome selects the first valid ciphersuite when AES is preferred, which is the same in utls. So no change is done there. Affected symbols: `HelloChrome_120`, `HelloChrome_120_PQ`, `HelloChrome_131`, `HelloChrome_133` Fix commit: 24bd1e05a788c1add7f3037f4532ea552b2cee07 Thanks to telegram @acgdaily for reporting this issue.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GO-2026-4509

Fingerprint vulnerability in uTLS from GREASE ECH mismatch for Chrome parrots in github.com/refraction-networking/utls

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence