UBUNTU-CVE-2024-38589
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl() syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f70 ---truncated---
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
49 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
58 explicit affected versions
57 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
63 explicit affected versions
54 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
191 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
90 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
118 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
47 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
111 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
95 explicit affected versions
103 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
120 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
144 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
83 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
53 explicit affected versions
95 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
188 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
138 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
132 explicit affected versions
52 explicit affected versions
165 explicit affected versions
154 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
139 explicit affected versions
53 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
116 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
60 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
98 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
82 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
47 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
140 explicit affected versions
94 explicit affected versions
46 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
82 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
167 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
52 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
97 explicit affected versions
54 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
48 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
83 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
72 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl() syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f70 ---truncated---
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1fbfb483c1a290dce3f41f52d45cc46dd88b7691
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3db2fc45d1d2a6457f06ebdfd45b9820e5b5c2b7
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/421c50fa81836775bf0fd6ce0e57a6eb27af24d5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5bc50a705cfac8f64ce51c95611c3dd0554ef9c3
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5fb7e2a4335fc67d6952ad2a6613c46e0b05f7c5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b117e5b4f27c2c9076561b6be450a9619f0b79de
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b9d663fbf74290cb68fbc66ae4367bd56837ad1d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f28bdc2ee5d9300cc77bd3d97b5b3cdd14960fd8
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-38589
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6949-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6949-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6951-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6952-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6952-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6953-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6955-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6979-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7007-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7009-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7019-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-38589