UBUNTU-CVE-2024-53047
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock Enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT creates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by mptcp_connect/176. stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822) mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7)) mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1)) ? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28) inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386) ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1)) __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576) __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671) ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712) ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1)) __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) That's because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not used despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of mptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids the warning.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
16 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
22 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mptcp: init: protect sched with rcu_read_lock Enabling CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST with its dependence CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT creates this splat when an MPTCP socket is created: ============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Not tainted ----------------------------- net/mptcp/sched.c:44 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 no locks held by mptcp_connect/176. stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 176 Comm: mptcp_connect Not tainted 6.12.0-rc2+ #11 Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) lockdep_rcu_suspicious (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:6822) mptcp_sched_find (net/mptcp/sched.c:44 (discriminator 7)) mptcp_init_sock (net/mptcp/protocol.c:2867 (discriminator 1)) ? sock_init_data_uid (arch/x86/include/asm/atomic.h:28) inet_create.part.0.constprop.0 (net/ipv4/af_inet.c:386) ? __sock_create (include/linux/rcupdate.h:347 (discriminator 1)) __sock_create (net/socket.c:1576) __sys_socket (net/socket.c:1671) ? __pfx___sys_socket (net/socket.c:1712) ? do_user_addr_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1419 (discriminator 1)) __x64_sys_socket (net/socket.c:1728) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 (discriminator 1)) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130) That's because when the socket is initialised, rcu_read_lock() is not used despite the explicit comment written above the declaration of mptcp_sched_find() in sched.c. Adding the missing lock/unlock avoids the warning.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/3deb12c788c385e17142ce6ec50f769852fcec65
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3deb12c788c385e17142ce6ec50f769852fcec65
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/494eb22f9a7bd03783e60595a57611c209175f1a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cb8b81ad3e893a6d18dcdd3754cc2ea2a42c0136
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-53047
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7276-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7277-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7310-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7449-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7449-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7450-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7451-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7452-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7453-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7468-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7523-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7524-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-53047