UBUNTU-CVE-2024-58237
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers. Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected: int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk) { bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0); return 0; } SEC("tc") int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; ... make p valid ... tail_call(sk); *p = 42; /* this is unsafe */ ... } The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
89 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
100 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
86 explicit affected versions
76 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
90 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
64 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
28 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
68 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
96 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
60 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
22 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
71 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
66 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
22 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
81 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers Tail-called programs could execute any of the helpers that invalidate packet pointers. Hence, conservatively assume that each tail call invalidates packet pointers. Making the change in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() automatically makes use of check_cfg() logic that computes 'changes_pkt_data' effect for global sub-programs, such that the following program could be rejected: int tail_call(struct __sk_buff *sk) { bpf_tail_call_static(sk, &jmp_table, 0); return 0; } SEC("tc") int not_safe(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; ... make p valid ... tail_call(sk); *p = 42; /* this is unsafe */ ... } The tc_bpf2bpf.c:subprog_tc() needs change: mark it as a function that can invalidate packet pointers. Otherwise, it can't be freplaced with tailcall_freplace.c:entry_freplace() that does a tail call.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a4607ffba35bf2a630aab299e34dd3f6e658d70
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1c2244437f9ad3dd91215f920401a14f2542dbfc
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-58237
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7513-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7513-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7513-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7513-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7513-5
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7514-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7515-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7515-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7522-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7523-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7524-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-58237