UBUNTU-CVE-2025-21986
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: switchdev: Convert blocking notification chain to a raw one A blocking notification chain uses a read-write semaphore to protect the integrity of the chain. The semaphore is acquired for writing when adding / removing notifiers to / from the chain and acquired for reading when traversing the chain and informing notifiers about an event. In case of the blocking switchdev notification chain, recursive notifications are possible which leads to the semaphore being acquired twice for reading and to lockdep warnings being generated [1]. Specifically, this can happen when the bridge driver processes a SWITCHDEV_BRPORT_UNOFFLOADED event which causes it to emit notifications about deferred events when calling switchdev_deferred_process(). Fix this by converting the notification chain to a raw notification chain in a similar fashion to the netdev notification chain. Protect the chain using the RTNL mutex by acquiring it when modifying the chain. Events are always informed under the RTNL mutex, but add an assertion in call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() to make sure this is not violated in the future. Maintain the "blocking" prefix as events are always emitted from process context and listeners are allowed to block. [1]: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.14.0-rc4-custom-g079270089484 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- ip/52731 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by ip/52731: #0: ffffffff84f795b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x727/0x1dc0 #1: ffffffff8731f628 (&net->rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x790/0x1dc0 #2: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 stack backtrace: ... ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x10/0x10 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0xb3/0x1b0 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? switchdev_deferred_process+0x11a/0x340 switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x27/0xd0 switchdev_deferred_process+0x164/0x340 br_switchdev_port_unoffload+0xc8/0x100 [bridge] br_switchdev_blocking_event+0x29f/0x580 [bridge] notifier_call_chain+0xa2/0x440 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6e/0xa0 switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload+0xde/0x1a0 ...
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
78 explicit affected versions
132 explicit affected versions
98 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
86 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
53 explicit affected versions
116 explicit affected versions
89 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
100 explicit affected versions
61 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
76 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
90 explicit affected versions
191 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
28 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
118 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
64 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
120 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
124 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
111 explicit affected versions
76 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
120 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
104 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
105 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
68 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
144 explicit affected versions
154 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
111 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
96 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
100 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
60 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
188 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
165 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
138 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
132 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
30 explicit affected versions
139 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
116 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
71 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
66 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
30 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
110 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
72 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
140 explicit affected versions
94 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
108 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
56 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
167 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
97 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
81 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
119 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
88 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
123 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: switchdev: Convert blocking notification chain to a raw one A blocking notification chain uses a read-write semaphore to protect the integrity of the chain. The semaphore is acquired for writing when adding / removing notifiers to / from the chain and acquired for reading when traversing the chain and informing notifiers about an event. In case of the blocking switchdev notification chain, recursive notifications are possible which leads to the semaphore being acquired twice for reading and to lockdep warnings being generated [1]. Specifically, this can happen when the bridge driver processes a SWITCHDEV_BRPORT_UNOFFLOADED event which causes it to emit notifications about deferred events when calling switchdev_deferred_process(). Fix this by converting the notification chain to a raw notification chain in a similar fashion to the netdev notification chain. Protect the chain using the RTNL mutex by acquiring it when modifying the chain. Events are always informed under the RTNL mutex, but add an assertion in call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers() to make sure this is not violated in the future. Maintain the "blocking" prefix as events are always emitted from process context and listeners are allowed to block. [1]: WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.14.0-rc4-custom-g079270089484 #1 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- ip/52731 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); lock((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by ip/52731: #0: ffffffff84f795b0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x727/0x1dc0 #1: ffffffff8731f628 (&net->rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x790/0x1dc0 #2: ffffffff850918d8 ((switchdev_blocking_notif_chain).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 stack backtrace: ... ? __pfx_down_read+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x10/0x10 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x58/0xa0 switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0xb3/0x1b0 ? __pfx_switchdev_port_attr_notify.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? switchdev_deferred_process+0x11a/0x340 switchdev_port_attr_set_deferred+0x27/0xd0 switchdev_deferred_process+0x164/0x340 br_switchdev_port_unoffload+0xc8/0x100 [bridge] br_switchdev_blocking_event+0x29f/0x580 [bridge] notifier_call_chain+0xa2/0x440 blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x6e/0xa0 switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload+0xde/0x1a0 ...
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/62531a1effa87bdab12d5104015af72e60d926ff
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f7d051814e7a0cb1f0717ed5527c1059992129d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62531a1effa87bdab12d5104015af72e60d926ff
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a597d4b75669ec82c72cbee9fe75a15d04b35b2b
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/af757f5ee3f754c5dceefb05c12ff37cb46fc682
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f9ed3fb50b872bd78bcb01f25087f9e4e25085d8
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-21986
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7605-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7605-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7606-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7628-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7764-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7764-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7765-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7766-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7767-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7767-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7779-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7790-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7800-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7801-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7801-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7801-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7802-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7809-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21986