UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38632
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner. However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled and it can still result in the same NULL pointer. The issue occurs due to the following interleaving: cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B) pin_request() { pin_free() { mutex_lock() desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0 .. mutex_unlock() mutex_lock(desc->mux) desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1 desc->mux_owner = owner; mutex_unlock(desc->mux) mutex_lock(desc->mux) desc->mux_owner = NULL; mutex_unlock(desc->mux) This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use (`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin. Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
9 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
28 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
30 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
30 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: pinmux: fix race causing mux_owner NULL with active mux_usecount commit 5a3e85c3c397 ("pinmux: Use sequential access to access desc->pinmux data") tried to address the issue when two client of the same gpio calls pinctrl_select_state() for the same functionality, was resulting in NULL pointer issue while accessing desc->mux_owner. However, issue was not completely fixed due to the way it was handled and it can still result in the same NULL pointer. The issue occurs due to the following interleaving: cpu0 (process A) cpu1 (process B) pin_request() { pin_free() { mutex_lock() desc->mux_usecount--; //becomes 0 .. mutex_unlock() mutex_lock(desc->mux) desc->mux_usecount++; // becomes 1 desc->mux_owner = owner; mutex_unlock(desc->mux) mutex_lock(desc->mux) desc->mux_owner = NULL; mutex_unlock(desc->mux) This sequence leads to a state where the pin appears to be in use (`mux_usecount == 1`) but has no owner (`mux_owner == NULL`), which can cause NULL pointer on next pin_request on the same pin. Ensure that updates to mux_usecount and mux_owner are performed atomically under the same lock. Only clear mux_owner when mux_usecount reaches zero and no new owner has been assigned.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b075c011032f88d1cfde3b45d6dcf08b44140eb
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22b585cbd67d14df3b91529d1b990661c300faa9
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b2a3e7189028aa7c4d53a84364f2ea9fb209787
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ea3f6b9a67be3476e331ce51cac316c2614a564
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b7bd6e3971eb7f0e34d2fdce1b18b08094e0c804
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-38632
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7879-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7879-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7879-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7879-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7880-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7934-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-5
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-6
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-7
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8028-8
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8031-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8031-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8031-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8052-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8052-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8074-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8074-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8126-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-38632