UBUNTU-CVE-2025-40078
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Explicitly check accesses to bpf_sock_addr Syzkaller found a kernel warning on the following sock_addr program: 0: r0 = 0 1: r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +60) 2: exit which triggers: verifier bug: error during ctx access conversion (0) This is happening because offset 60 in bpf_sock_addr corresponds to an implicit padding of 4 bytes, right after msg_src_ip4. Access to this padding isn't rejected in sock_addr_is_valid_access and it thus later fails to convert the access. This patch fixes it by explicitly checking the various fields of bpf_sock_addr in sock_addr_is_valid_access. I checked the other ctx structures and is_valid_access functions and didn't find any other similar cases. Other cases of (properly handled) padding are covered in new tests in a subsequent patch.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
53 explicit affected versions
116 explicit affected versions
88 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
73 explicit affected versions
73 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
68 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
30 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
40 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
64 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
120 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
124 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
76 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
104 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
105 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
111 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
100 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
49 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
65 explicit affected versions
81 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
57 explicit affected versions
28 explicit affected versions
40 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
132 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
66 explicit affected versions
68 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
54 explicit affected versions
121 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
110 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
72 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
28 explicit affected versions
108 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
56 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
81 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
70 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
70 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
119 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
88 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
123 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Explicitly check accesses to bpf_sock_addr Syzkaller found a kernel warning on the following sock_addr program: 0: r0 = 0 1: r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +60) 2: exit which triggers: verifier bug: error during ctx access conversion (0) This is happening because offset 60 in bpf_sock_addr corresponds to an implicit padding of 4 bytes, right after msg_src_ip4. Access to this padding isn't rejected in sock_addr_is_valid_access and it thus later fails to convert the access. This patch fixes it by explicitly checking the various fields of bpf_sock_addr in sock_addr_is_valid_access. I checked the other ctx structures and is_valid_access functions and didn't find any other similar cases. Other cases of (properly handled) padding are covered in new tests in a subsequent patch.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/6fabca2fc94d33cdf7ec102058983b086293395f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4f00858cd9bbbdf67159e28b85a8ca9e77c83622
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6d8b1a21fd5c34622b0c3893c61e4a38d8ba53ec
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fabca2fc94d33cdf7ec102058983b086293395f
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ad8b4fe5617e3c85fc23267f02500c4f3bf0ff69
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cdeafacb4f9ff261a96baef519e29480fd7b1019
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe9d33f0470350558cb08cecb54cf2267b3a45d2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-40078
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8030-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-5
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-6
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-7
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8033-8
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8034-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8034-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8048-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8095-5
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8100-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8125-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8126-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8141-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8163-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8163-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8165-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8243-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8261-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-40078