UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68169
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netpoll: Fix deadlock in memory allocation under spinlock Fix a AA deadlock in refill_skbs() where memory allocation while holding skb_pool->lock can trigger a recursive lock acquisition attempt. The deadlock scenario occurs when the system is under severe memory pressure: 1. refill_skbs() acquires skb_pool->lock (spinlock) 2. alloc_skb() is called while holding the lock 3. Memory allocator fails and calls slab_out_of_memory() 4. This triggers printk() for the OOM warning 5. The console output path calls netpoll_send_udp() 6. netpoll_send_udp() attempts to acquire the same skb_pool->lock 7. Deadlock: the lock is already held by the same CPU Call stack: refill_skbs() spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock) <- lock acquired __alloc_skb() kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof() slab_out_of_memory() printk() console_flush_all() netpoll_send_udp() skb_dequeue() spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock) <- deadlock attempt This bug was exposed by commit 248f6571fd4c51 ("netpoll: Optimize skb refilling on critical path") which removed refill_skbs() from the critical path (where nested printk was being deferred), letting nested printk being called from inside refill_skbs() Refactor refill_skbs() to never allocate memory while holding the spinlock. Another possible solution to fix this problem is protecting the refill_skbs() from nested printks, basically calling printk_deferred_{enter,exit}() in refill_skbs(), then, any nested pr_warn() would be deferred. I prefer this approach, given I _think_ it might be a good idea to move the alloc_skb() from GFP_ATOMIC to GFP_KERNEL in the future, so, having the alloc_skb() outside of the lock will be necessary step. There is a possible TOCTOU issue when checking for the pool length, and queueing the new allocated skb, but, this is not an issue, given that an extra SKB in the pool is harmless and it will be eventually used.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netpoll: Fix deadlock in memory allocation under spinlock Fix a AA deadlock in refill_skbs() where memory allocation while holding skb_pool->lock can trigger a recursive lock acquisition attempt. The deadlock scenario occurs when the system is under severe memory pressure: 1. refill_skbs() acquires skb_pool->lock (spinlock) 2. alloc_skb() is called while holding the lock 3. Memory allocator fails and calls slab_out_of_memory() 4. This triggers printk() for the OOM warning 5. The console output path calls netpoll_send_udp() 6. netpoll_send_udp() attempts to acquire the same skb_pool->lock 7. Deadlock: the lock is already held by the same CPU Call stack: refill_skbs() spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock) <- lock acquired __alloc_skb() kmem_cache_alloc_node_noprof() slab_out_of_memory() printk() console_flush_all() netpoll_send_udp() skb_dequeue() spin_lock_irqsave(&skb_pool->lock) <- deadlock attempt This bug was exposed by commit 248f6571fd4c51 ("netpoll: Optimize skb refilling on critical path") which removed refill_skbs() from the critical path (where nested printk was being deferred), letting nested printk being called from inside refill_skbs() Refactor refill_skbs() to never allocate memory while holding the spinlock. Another possible solution to fix this problem is protecting the refill_skbs() from nested printks, basically calling printk_deferred_{enter,exit}() in refill_skbs(), then, any nested pr_warn() would be deferred. I prefer this approach, given I _think_ it might be a good idea to move the alloc_skb() from GFP_ATOMIC to GFP_KERNEL in the future, so, having the alloc_skb() outside of the lock will be necessary step. There is a possible TOCTOU issue when checking for the pool length, and queueing the new allocated skb, but, this is not an issue, given that an extra SKB in the pool is harmless and it will be eventually used.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/327c20c21d80e0d87834b392d83ae73c955ad8ff
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/06742a3ab884d7428c9050b205ffcf6a8a548397
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/327c20c21d80e0d87834b392d83ae73c955ad8ff
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68169
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8029-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8030-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8048-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68169