UBUNTU-CVE-2025-68725
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers") because there were malicious (syzbot) senders that combine a protocol with a non-matching gso_type. If we would want to drop such packets, gso_features_check() currently only returns feature flags via netif_skb_features(), so one location for potentially dropping such skbs could be validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(), but then otoh it would be an additional check in the fast-path for a very corner case. Given bpf_clone_redirect() is the only place where BPF test infra could emit such packets, lets reject them right there.
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
82 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
72 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
64 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
49 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
25 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
59 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
32 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
89 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
47 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
53 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
61 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
83 explicit affected versions
47 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
66 explicit affected versions
72 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
58 explicit affected versions
40 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
49 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
31 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
48 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
36 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
74 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
83 explicit affected versions
73 explicit affected versions
73 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
73 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Do not let BPF test infra emit invalid GSO types to stack Yinhao et al. reported that their fuzzer tool was able to trigger a skb_warn_bad_offload() from netif_skb_features() -> gso_features_check(). When a BPF program - triggered via BPF test infra - pushes the packet to the loopback device via bpf_clone_redirect() then mentioned offload warning can be seen. GSO-related features are then rightfully disabled. We get into this situation due to convert___skb_to_skb() setting gso_segs and gso_size but not gso_type. Technically, it makes sense that this warning triggers since the GSO properties are malformed due to the gso_type. Potentially, the gso_type could be marked non-trustworthy through setting it at least to SKB_GSO_DODGY without any other specific assumptions, but that also feels wrong given we should not go further into the GSO engine in the first place. The checks were added in 121d57af308d ("gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers") because there were malicious (syzbot) senders that combine a protocol with a non-matching gso_type. If we would want to drop such packets, gso_features_check() currently only returns feature flags via netif_skb_features(), so one location for potentially dropping such skbs could be validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(), but then otoh it would be an additional check in the fast-path for a very corner case. Given bpf_clone_redirect() is the only place where BPF test infra could emit such packets, lets reject them right there.
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/04a899573fb87273a656f178b5f920c505f68875
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fbea4c63b5385588cb44ab21f91e55e33c719a54
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68725
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8162-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8177-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8177-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-4
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-5
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8180-6
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8183-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8183-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8186-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8187-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8188-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8243-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8245-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8257-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8275-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8278-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8278-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8289-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8289-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8296-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8296-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8297-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8393-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8440-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8499-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68725