UBUNTU-CVE-2026-52977
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup During wait-requeue-pi (task A) and requeue-PI (task B) the following race can happen: Task A Task B futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_setup_timer() futex_do_wait() futex_requeue() CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1); CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2); *timeout* futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() requeue_state = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE *blocks on hb->lock* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() futex_requeue_pi_prepare() Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE => -EAGAIN double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2) *retry* Task B acquires both hb locks and attempts to acquire the PI-lock of the top most waiter (task B). Task A is leaving early due to a signal/ timeout and started removing itself from the queue. It updates its requeue_state but can not remove it from the list because this requires the hb lock which is owned by task B. Usually task A is able to swoop the lock after task B unlocked it. However if task B is of higher priority then task A may not be able to wake up in time and acquire the lock before task B gets it again. Especially on a UP system where A is never scheduled. As a result task A blocks on the lock and task B busy loops, trying to make progress but live locks the system instead. Tragic. This can be fixed by removing the top most waiter from the list in this case. This allows task B to grab the next top waiter (if any) in the next iteration and make progress. Remove the top most waiter if futex_requeue_pi_prepare() fails. Let the waiter conditionally remove itself from the list in handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup().
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
89 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
100 explicit affected versions
61 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
85 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
86 explicit affected versions
76 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
90 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
84 explicit affected versions
40 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
42 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
64 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
52 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
48 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
34 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
68 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
96 explicit affected versions
41 explicit affected versions
40 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
60 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
20 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
77 explicit affected versions
93 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
69 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
48 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
46 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
15 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
71 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
66 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
55 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
46 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
92 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
81 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
91 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
79 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
39 explicit affected versions
80 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent lockup in requeue-PI during signal/ timeout wakeup During wait-requeue-pi (task A) and requeue-PI (task B) the following race can happen: Task A Task B futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_setup_timer() futex_do_wait() futex_requeue() CLASS(hb, hb1)(&key1); CLASS(hb, hb2)(&key2); *timeout* futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync() requeue_state = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE *blocks on hb->lock* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() futex_requeue_pi_prepare() Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE => -EAGAIN double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2) *retry* Task B acquires both hb locks and attempts to acquire the PI-lock of the top most waiter (task B). Task A is leaving early due to a signal/ timeout and started removing itself from the queue. It updates its requeue_state but can not remove it from the list because this requires the hb lock which is owned by task B. Usually task A is able to swoop the lock after task B unlocked it. However if task B is of higher priority then task A may not be able to wake up in time and acquire the lock before task B gets it again. Especially on a UP system where A is never scheduled. As a result task A blocks on the lock and task B busy loops, trying to make progress but live locks the system instead. Tragic. This can be fixed by removing the top most waiter from the list in this case. This allows task B to grab the next top waiter (if any) in the next iteration and make progress. Remove the top most waiter if futex_requeue_pi_prepare() fails. Let the waiter conditionally remove itself from the list in handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup().
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/bc7304f3ae20972d11db6e0b1b541c63feda5f05
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-52977
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8566-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8567-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8568-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8569-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8574-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8574-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8574-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8593-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8595-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8595-2
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8595-3
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8596-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8603-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8606-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8607-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8608-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8609-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8618-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8619-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52977