UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64059
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix folio->private handling in netfs_perform_write() Under some circumstances, netfs_perform_write() doesn't correctly manipulate folio->private between NULL, NETFS_FOLIO_COPY_TO_CACHE, pointing to a group and pointing to a netfs_folio struct, leading to potential multiple attachments of private data with associated folio ref leaks and also leaks of netfs_folio structs or netfs_group refs. Fix this by consolidating the place at which a folio is marked uptodate in one place and having that look at what's attached to folio->private and decide how to clean it up and then set the new group. Also, the content shouldn't be flushed if group is NULL, even if a group is specified in the netfs_group parameter, as that would be the case for a new folio. A filesystem should always specify netfs_group or never specify netfs_group. The Sashiko auto-review tool noted that it was theoretically possible that the fpos >= ctx->zero_point section might leak if it modified a streaming write folio. This is unlikely, but with a network filesystem, third party changes can happen. It also pointed out that __netfs_set_group() would leak if called multiple times on the same folio from the "whole folio modify section".
02 / AFFECTED SOFTWARE
Affected packages
11 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
50 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
19 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
24 explicit affected versions
2 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
35 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
21 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
29 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
33 explicit affected versions
23 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
17 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
51 explicit affected versions
18 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
27 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
5 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
12 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
44 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
3 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
26 explicit affected versions
45 explicit affected versions
37 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
38 explicit affected versions
9 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
7 explicit affected versions
13 explicit affected versions
43 explicit affected versions
16 explicit affected versions
10 explicit affected versions
8 explicit affected versions
14 explicit affected versions
4 explicit affected versions
78 explicit affected versions
11 explicit affected versions
1 explicit affected versions
6 explicit affected versions
03 / CONNECTIONS
Connected vulnerabilities
04 / EVIDENCE
Source records
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix folio->private handling in netfs_perform_write() Under some circumstances, netfs_perform_write() doesn't correctly manipulate folio->private between NULL, NETFS_FOLIO_COPY_TO_CACHE, pointing to a group and pointing to a netfs_folio struct, leading to potential multiple attachments of private data with associated folio ref leaks and also leaks of netfs_folio structs or netfs_group refs. Fix this by consolidating the place at which a folio is marked uptodate in one place and having that look at what's attached to folio->private and decide how to clean it up and then set the new group. Also, the content shouldn't be flushed if group is NULL, even if a group is specified in the netfs_group parameter, as that would be the case for a new folio. A filesystem should always specify netfs_group or never specify netfs_group. The Sashiko auto-review tool noted that it was theoretically possible that the fpos >= ctx->zero_point section might leak if it modified a streaming write folio. This is unlikely, but with a network filesystem, third party changes can happen. It also pointed out that __netfs_set_group() would leak if called multiple times on the same folio from the "whole folio modify section".
05 / REFERENCES
Further evidence
- https://git.kernel.org/linus/ccde2ac757c713535b224233a296de40efe5212d
- https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-64059
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8593-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8603-1
- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8618-1
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64059